<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>What can creators of Wikipedia do to enhance its image as a credible resource? - BrainReactions.net Online Brainstorming</title>
    <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
    <description>BrainReactions.net Online Brainstorming</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:31:18</pubDate>
    <generator>BrainReactions.net Online Brainstorming</generator>
    <webMaster>webmaster@brainreactions.net</webMaster>
    <ttl>20</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>14. Sections of Wikipedia entries could link to chapters of published books -- the whole chapter would be displayed online. For example, the Wikipedia entry on The Beatles has a section about their recreational drug use. This entry could link to the chapter of a published Beatles book that discusses their drug use. This would publicise the book, and also Wikipedia users would know that the information is reliable, as it's from a published, edited book.</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>20341</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:31:18</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>13. Offer rewards for anyone who spots mistakes. Have charts ranking the most successful "mistake spotters".</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18809</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:48:54</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12. Give experts the power to 'lock' entries permanently. </title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18803</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:04:46</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>11. publish original literature that has not been published elsewhere - something really big, even if it is rare, will get news headlines. ie. in the Cancer article, say somebody discovers it can be caused by ice cream, you put it in there before Science and Nature, and they have to cite Wikipedia!</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18799</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:28:34</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10. have famous Ph.D.'s in that subject give their official stamp</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18798</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 10:26:32</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9. As an extension, allow ppl to form communities so they join a certain opinion group to debate against the other side. This will gt more involved and create better defined boundaries between facts and opinion.</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18276</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:27:45</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8. ensure all entries are fact based and not opinion based</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18275</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:25:26</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7. start an ad campaign where people say how credible and useful the content is</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18262</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:32:08</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6. Create a "Credibility Indicator" that shows up on the top of every page and have a select panel of experts give an approval rating to it.</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18207</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:33:48</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5. Content partnership with an encyclopedia publisher.  A topic page would include the traditional encyclopedia entry and the user content that Wikipedia is known for. </title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18197</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:43:45</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4. Engage an editorial review board</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18189</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:20:33</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3. Engage Phds in the related fields to write articles</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18188</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:20:23</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2. cite data</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18187</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:19:39</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>1. cite sources in text</title>
      <link>http://brainreactions.net/brainstorms/1692</link>
      <guid>18186</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 13:19:36</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
